home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT0491>
- <title>
- Feb. 20, 1989: Moscow Station
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Feb. 20, 1989 Betrayal:Marine Spy Scandal
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- WORLD, Page 50
- COVER STORY: Moscow Station
- </hdr><body>
- <p>How the KGB penetrated the American Embassy
- </p>
- <p>--By Ronald Kessler
- </p>
- <p> After the spy scandal among Marine guards at the U.S.
- embassy in Moscow burst onto front pages two years ago, Ronald
- Kessler, former investigative reporter for the Washington Post
- and the Wall Street Journal, spent months interviewing Marines,
- diplomats, Government investigators and intelligence sources to
- find out what had happened. The author of three previous books
- (including Spy vs. Spy: Stalking Soviet Spies in America),
- Kessler discovered that Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger had
- been correct when he described the Soviet penetration of
- American security as "massive." At a diplomatic mission with a
- striking lack of security, female KGB agents seemed to have
- little trouble luring lonely Marines into spying. In a cover
- story and numerous articles, TIME made a similar assessment.
- But as suspects recanted their confessions, only one Marine,
- Clayton Lonetree, was convicted of espionage. Embarrassed, U.S.
- Government agencies took to minimizing the damage, contending
- that the KGB had not looted the embassy of its secrets after
- all. The spy furor quickly faded away. Yet, as Kessler details
- in the following excerpts from his book Moscow Station: How the
- KGB Penetrated the American Embassy, the security breach was
- even worse than originally feared.
- </p>
- <p> GUARDING THE JEWELS
- </p>
- <p> The jewels to the CIA's Moscow station were shielded by a
- metal shack behind a vault door on the ninth floor of the
- American embassy. Known as the Communications Programs Unit, or
- CPU, the shack was a metal chamber within a room as large as
- the Situation Room of the White House, roughly 30 ft. by 20 ft.
- Made of galvanized steel, the CPU looked like a huge walk-in
- refrigerator. A dozen CIA, National Security Agency and State
- Department code clerks worked inside it, protecting some of the
- U.S. Government's most sensitive information.
- </p>
- <p> Within the CPU was the CIA's code room, the inner sanctum of
- the mustard-colored beaux arts embassy building on Tchaikovsky
- Street. Here, gleaming gray cipher machines encoded and decoded
- messages transmitted by commercial satellite at 9,600 characters
- a second between Moscow and CIA headquarters in Langley, Va.
- These machines were the most precious commodity at Moscow
- station. Through them flowed top-secret details of CIA
- operations targeted against the Soviet Union. Other crypto
- machines in the CPU transmitted the results of National
- Security Agency eavesdropping on Kremlin communications, as well
- as instructions from Secretary of State George Shultz to
- Ambassador Arthur Hartman on dealing with the Soviets. If the
- Soviets could read the messages, they would know how to counter
- American arms-negotiating strategies and evade NSA
- eavesdropping techniques. Most damaging of all, they would be
- able to identify the CIA's informants in the Soviet Union. For
- such informants, this would almost certainly mean execution.
- </p>
- <p> The CIA was supremely confident that the codes couldn't be
- broken. Yet in recent years the KGB's efforts to penetrate the
- embassy had grown from a drizzle to a downpour. By 1984 the KGB
- had managed to implant bugs in 13 IBM Selectric typewriters
- used in the Moscow embassy and the consulate in Leningrad. The
- bugs recorded the movements of the typing balls and transmitted
- the information in coded bursts to a KGB listening post in an
- apartment next to the embassy. As a result, all of the highly
- classified data prepared on the bugged typewriters -- including
- names of CIA officers stationed at the embassy -- found their
- way to the KGB's headquarters.
- </p>
- <p> But bugging typewriters and breaching the inner chamber of
- the CPU were entirely different matters. All the ingenuity and
- technical resources of U.S. intelligence agencies had been
- marshaled to make sure the embassy's communications were secure.
- Beyond that, U.S. Marines were there to guard the jewels with
- their honor and their lives. The Marines were the front line of
- defense. Of all the services, they had the reputation of being
- the fiercest, the most patriotic, the toughest.
- </p>
- <p> But their adversary was shrewd. Ever since the U.S. and
- Soviet Union had established diplomatic relations in 1933, the
- Soviets had been trying to compromise embassy employees and
- gain access to U.S. codes. What better way to do that than by
- having KGB officers and informants work in the embassy right
- alongside the Americans? It seems inconceivable that the
- Americans would allow such a thing. Certainly neither the CIA
- nor the State Department would ever permit a Soviet national to
- work at their headquarters in Washington, not even to sweep the
- floors. Nor had the Soviets ever let an American work inside
- their embassy in Washington.
- </p>
- <p> Yet over the years the KGB had woven such a cocoon around
- the Americans in Moscow that they actually wanted Soviets to
- work in the U.S. embassy. When Americans came to Moscow, they
- found that everything from looking up a telephone number to
- hiring a plumber took an inordinate amount of time. It was
- easier and cheaper to employ Soviet nationals at the embassy to
- cut through Moscow's bureaucratic jungle. And only Soviets
- supplied by UPDK, a state agency controlled by the KGB, could
- work in foreign embassies in Moscow.
- </p>
- <p> So the Americans used the Soviets to drive them to the
- ballet, cut their hair, fix their radios, answer their phones at
- the embassy switchboard. A would-be defector had to talk first
- to a Soviet before he could plead for help from an American. The
- KGB had 206 Soviet informants working in the U.S. embassy,
- outnumbering the Americans.
- </p>
- <p> SOME FUZZY RULES
- </p>
- <p> For the Marines stationed there, arriving in the Soviet
- Union was like stepping onto another planet. Driving from
- Sheremetyevo International Airport, they were impressed by how
- shabby everything seemed. The embassy, a ghastly yellow, looked
- more like a grubby warehouse than an office building.
- </p>
- <p> The Marines entered the embassy through Post 1, which
- controls access to the building. To the left of the entrance,
- just inside the door, the post was enclosed in bulletproof
- glass. It was the size of a highway toll booth. Video monitors
- and switches lined the cubicle. Keys dangled from hooks on the
- walls. The post guarded the central wing of the embassy that
- housed offices and some residences. The south and north wings
- housed mostly residences. Including the Marines, roughly 100
- Americans lived within the embassy.
- </p>
- <p> On the second floor of the north wing was part of the Marine
- House, a depressing area that included a bar, pool table and
- kitchen. Yellow, peeling linoleum barely covered the floor. The
- Marines actually lived on the second, third and fourth floors
- of the central wing. The seventh and higher floors of the
- central wing were the embassy's secure areas. The CIA was on
- the seventh floor, along with the State Department's political
- section.
- </p>
- <p> More than half of the ninth floor was taken up by the CPU.
- On the rest of the floor were the offices of the ambassador, his
- deputy and the regional security officer, or RSO. On the tenth
- floor were NSA employees, who eavesdropped on Soviet
- communications, and the military attaches, who gathered
- information on Soviet military strength. An attic contained
- sending and receiving equipment and a shredder and incinerator.
- </p>
- <p> To get to the secure floors, the Americans had to take the
- main elevator to the ninth floor. There, in a small anteroom,
- was Post 3, the most critical guard post in the embassy, a
- platform surrounded by a high, horseshoe-shaped Formica
- counter. Anyone who wanted to enter the CPU or the ambassador's
- office, or the other secure floors, had to pass by the Marine
- at Post 3.
- </p>
- <p> According to the rules, Marines could have female guests
- only in the lounge area in the north wing. Another rule said
- Marines "will not fraternize with foreign nationals of either
- sex from any of the following countries: Bulgaria, Rumania,
- Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Poland, the U.S.S.R., Yugoslavia or
- East Germany." Any contact, except at an embassy function, was
- to be reported to the noncommissioned officer in charge. At the
- same time, a Navy rule said any "form of contact, intentional or
- otherwise, with any citizen of a Communist-controlled country .
- . . must be reported to the Naval Investigative Service."
- </p>
- <p> This placed the Marines in an ambiguous position. The NIS
- had no representative in Moscow. Moreover, a State Department
- rule said contacts should be reported to the RSO. Worse yet,
- many Marines felt they could get in trouble for reporting any
- contacts. As a result, each Marine had his own interpretation of
- what should be reported.
- </p>
- <p> One of the Marines' most important functions was to write up
- embassy employees who violated the rules on safekeeping of
- classified documents. A violation could lead to suspension or
- dismissal. Yet when the Marines issued violations, Richard H.
- Klingenmaier, the RSO, would often refuse to ratify them.
- </p>
- <p> The Marines were also unhappy about the video monitors they
- were supposed to watch to determine whether they should let cars
- enter the embassy's courtyard. If they did not recognize the
- drivers, they were not supposed to let them in. But the cameras
- produced blurry pictures, froze up or didn't turn on at all.
- "You could barely make out if it was a car or if it was a Soviet
- or an American," said one Marine sergeant.
- </p>
- <p> Another concern was Ambassador Hartman's approach to
- security. An avuncular man with thinning white hair, blue eyes
- and a round face, he was one of the brightest officers in the
- Foreign Service. He knew little about security, nor was he
- supposed to. But he was convinced he knew more than the experts.
- </p>
- <p> When Master Gunnery Sergeant Joey Wingate arrived in Moscow,
- he was shocked to learn that Hartman did not allow the Marines
- to wear weapons. "He said, `I just don't want an incident where
- we shoot a Soviet,' " said Wingate. "I felt he'd rather have a
- Marine killed." Wingate finally got Hartman to agree to let the
- Marines wear guns -- unloaded. The ammunition was to be kept at
- their guard posts in a drawer. "One of the things you're there
- for is to make contact with (Soviet) society, not to cut
- yourself off," Hartman would say. "If the idea is to build a
- bunker, you might as well close it down."
- </p>
- <p> The same reasoning led Hartman to say he preferred Soviets
- over Americans for certain tasks. "I'd rather have a basic
- number of them doing things like running my car and a few other
- jobs, and they would find out no more than the guys watching us
- from the windows," he said. He maintained he wanted the Soviets
- to hear most of what he was saying anyway. "I wanted them to
- know my view of what was going on. We would go in the (secure)
- room on sensitive stuff."
- </p>
- <p> PROMOTING A LOSER
- </p>
- <p> Given the well-documented tactics of the KGB, the last thing
- anyone would want to do is send a young, immature, single man
- to Moscow. Almost perversely, that is what the State Department
- and the Marine Corps had been doing since 1934. And of all the
- candidates sent there, it would be difficult to imagine anyone
- less qualified than Clayton Lonetree.
- </p>
- <p> Self-pitying, naive and impudent, Lonetree had unrealistic
- expectations of himself, a consuming need to be loved and barely
- enough intelligence to fire a weapon, let alone defend himself
- against the sophisticated onslaught of the KGB.
- </p>
- <p> Not that he did not come from a distinguished family. His
- grandfather had been chief of the Winnebago Indians of
- Wisconsin. His great-uncle Mitchell Red Cloud, a descendant of
- Chief Fighting Bull, had won the Congressional Medal of Honor
- during the Korean War. His father Spencer Lonetree, a Winnebago
- and Sioux, was active in Indian affairs and had gained the
- respect of a number of local politicians. But he was also a
- stubborn, vain man, and Clayton felt he had a drinking problem.
- </p>
- <p> Spencer never married Clayton's mother Sally Tsotie, who is
- part white and part Navajo. When Clayton was eight, his mother
- took him and his younger brother Craig to New Mexico, where she
- worked as a cook in an Indian mission. After four months she
- returned to the Navajo reservation, leaving the children at the
- mission. Asked why she did so, she replied that Spencer "didn't
- give me money to pay rent or buy food. Men never pay." Clayton
- never recovered from the hurt of being rejected.
- </p>
- <p> Spencer Lonetree took the children to Minnesota. At Johnson
- High School in St. Paul, Lonetree handed his American-history
- teacher a notebook with a swastika and the inscription "Hitler
- Lives" on the cover. His teacher returned the notebook to
- Lonetree. Later Lonetree handed in the notebook again with the
- inscriptions "Holocaust is a lie" and "Adolf Hitler." Inside he
- wrote, "Jews are our misfortune" and "Hitler had the right
- idea."
- </p>
- <p> In the summer of 1980, Lonetree enlisted in the Marines, in
- part to get away from his father. He was one of the smaller
- recruits at 121 lbs. and 5 ft. 7 1/2 in. tall. After making
- corporal, he decided to become a Marine security guard. He said
- he wanted to become a guard because he was "looking for a little
- adventure."
- </p>
- <p> Many excellent Marines had served in the program, but by
- Lonetree's day it was known as a dumping ground. Between 1980
- and 1987 no fewer than 545 Marine guards -- 10% of the total on
- duty during that time -- had been removed for infractions
- including black-marketeering, rape, fraternizing and drug use.
- If there ever were a case for dropping Marines as embassy
- guards, it was contained in those records.
- </p>
- <p> Almost from the beginning of his Moscow assignment in 1984,
- Lonetree, then 22, was in trouble. Usually it only took a few
- drinks for him to become unruly. One night he locked himself out
- of his room, passed out on the floor and showed up 7 1/2 hours
- late for guard duty.
- </p>
- <p> It was a mystery to Wingate how Lonetree had ever got into
- the guard program. "He was a loner, not very articulate,
- borderline in the mental category," he would say later. Yet
- within several months of his arrival, the Marine Corps promoted
- Lonetree to sergeant. Wingate objected but was overruled.
- </p>
- <p> In the summer of 1985, a Navy officer found Lonetree asleep
- on guard duty. Wingate recommended that he be sent back to
- Quantico, reduced in rank to corporal and removed from the
- guard program. Again he was overruled. Having made the mistake
- of sending Lonetree to Moscow, the Marine Corps now compounded
- the error by ignoring evidence that he was unfit to guard a
- grocery store, let alone the CIA station in Moscow.
- </p>
- <p> ONE-NIGHT-STANDS AND SWALLOWS
- </p>
- <p> Five embassy wives, dubbed by the Marines "the home
- wreckers," routinely picked up Marines at Uncle Sam's, the
- embassy disco, on Friday nights. Typically, one wife would sit
- with a Marine and mention that another wife was interested in
- him. "If he wants her, she's up for grabs," was the
- not-so-subtle line leading to a one-night stand. One young
- State Department employee made it a practice to sleep with as
- many Marines and Seabees as she could. In September she took on
- three Marines in one of their rooms.
- </p>
- <p> In a hostile environment like Moscow, the affairs invited
- KGB blackmail. Yet Wingate was less concerned with the home
- wreckers' activities than with the number of Marines seeing
- Soviet women. One guard had been going with a well-built Soviet
- woman for six months, leaving her pregnant. Her father was an
- intelligence officer formerly stationed in Washington.
- </p>
- <p> For months Lonetree had had his eye on a 25-year-old Soviet
- woman who worked in the embassy. To Lonetree, she had
- everything: 5 ft. 9 in., 130 lbs., fair skin, high cheekbones,
- good figure, large gray eyes, sandy brown hair cut to her neck.
- She dressed stylishly, wore makeup well, spoke almost perfect
- English. UPDK, the Soviet agency that supplied workers, had
- sent her to the embassy in May 1985. Initially, the woman,
- Violetta A. Seina, was a receptionist for the ambassador.
- Hartman's wife Donna took an immediate dislike to her: "She was
- like a pussycat, always waiting and watching." Hartman had
- Violetta reassigned to the customs area, where she worked no
- more than 10 ft. from Post 1. Lonetree could not help noticing
- her.
- </p>
- <p> Lonetree loved to ride Moscow's marble-floored, chandeliered
- subways, which cost five kopecks -- about 6 cents. In September
- 1985, he saw Violetta on the subway. He thought the meeting was
- a chance encounter; most likely the KGB had set it up. Lonetree
- had just gone through disciplinary proceedings and was known to
- become boisterous after only a few drinks -- a ripe target. The
- two chatted for a few minutes, then parted.
- </p>
- <p> He saw her again on a subway train in October. After she
- missed her stop, they got off at the next one and took a walk.
- They met again at the Marine Corps ball on Nov. 10. Violetta
- showed up with two women, Galya and Natasha, who worked at the
- embassy; the CIA later identified them as KGB officers.
- Lonetree danced with Violetta several times. He was hooked.
- </p>
- <p> Lonetree met Violetta at a subway station again in December,
- and she invited him to her home. She showed Lonetree books,
- records and her childhood photos. They discussed the fact that
- the embassy had just fired her and that UPDK had assigned her
- to work at the Irish embassy.
- </p>
- <p> Lonetree began having sex with Violetta in January 1986, and
- the KGB began stepping up the pressure. Some weeks later,
- Violetta introduced Lonetree to a man she said was her Uncle
- Sasha. Sasha, 33, was 6 ft. 4 in. tall and had a large frame
- and graying brown hair. According to CIA files, Sasha in fact
- was Aleksei G. Yefimov, a KGB officer.
- </p>
- <p> Pretending he did not speak English well, Yefimov asked
- Lonetree about life in America. It seemed to Lonetree that
- Yefimov treated Violetta like a daughter. Lonetree did not
- suspect that Yefimov was anything other than her Uncle Sasha.
- </p>
- <p> Now the KGB moved in for the kill. Violetta told Lonetree
- that Uncle Sasha wanted to see him again. Already subject to
- blackmail and eager to continue seeing her, Lonetree agreed to
- meet him early in February 1986. This time, Yefimov's English
- had improved; he no longer needed Violetta to translate. She
- had previously told Lonetree the Soviets wanted peace, and
- Lonetree empathized with that view, saying he was a friend of
- the Soviet Union.
- </p>
- <p> Now Yefimov said, "If you are a friend of the Soviet Union,
- you will help me and Violetta."
- </p>
- <p> "How is helping you going to help her?" Lonetree asked.
- </p>
- <p> "She's your friend, but you would also be helping the Soviet
- people."
- </p>
- <p> Yefimov pulled out a list of questions he said had been
- prepared by a friend who was a KGB general. Was Michael Sellers,
- a second secretary of the embassy, in the CIA? Lonetree did not
- always know for sure. But from the locations of staffers'
- offices and whom they associated with, he could make a few
- deductions. About a month later, the Soviets expelled Sellers
- for allegedly engaging in spying. It is likely the Soviets knew
- about Sellers and were testing Lonetree to see if he would
- confirm the CIA identity.
- </p>
- <p> Yefimov next asked about Murat Natirboff, widely known to be
- the CIA station chief. Lonetree confirmed that he was. Yefimov
- asked Lonetree if he could plant bugs in the offices of
- Natirboff and Hartman. Lonetree said he would not.
- </p>
- <p> The fact that Yefimov did not ask Lonetree to place bugs in
- the CPU is significant. Indeed, nearly all his questions had to
- do with the seventh floor, where the CIA was located, rather
- than the ninth floor, site of the CPU. In retrospect, this
- raised the question of whether the Soviets already had bugs in
- the CPU.
- </p>
- <p> Yefimov asked Lonetree if he could get the plans to the
- seventh floor, and he said he would try. From having an affair
- with a Soviet woman, Lonetree had passed over the line to
- espionage.
- </p>
- <p> A few weeks later, Lonetree brought along floor plans that
- he stole from the embassy. Yefimov produced a folder containing
- photos of more than 300 embassy personnel. He asked Lonetree to
- arrange the photos to show who was married to whom. Lonetree
- did so. Yefimov pulled out an embassy phone book and asked
- about the functions of each person. Besides Sellers and
- Natirboff, Lonetree disclosed the names of two other CIA
- employees who were never expelled.
- </p>
- <p> Turning to the floor plans, Yefimov asked Lonetree to mark
- sensitive spaces, secret doors and security devices on the
- seventh floor. Lonetree told him how the alarm systems worked
- and how the Marines reacted to them. Yefimov was particularly
- interested in Hartman's desk. Several times he asked Lonetree to
- describe it, presumably so the KGB could design a listening
- device for it. Repeatedly, he asked if Lonetree would place
- listening devices in the embassy, and repeatedly Lonetree
- declined.
- </p>
- <p> Lonetree tried to tell himself that the nature of the visits
- had not changed, that they were still social, that Violetta had
- no connection with the KGB. If he had admitted to himself that
- she was a KGB plant, he would have to face up to the fact that
- she did not love him. She gave him the love he had craved as a
- child, and that was more important to him than their four sexual
- encounters.
- </p>
- <p> Transferred to the Vienna embassy in March 1986, Lonetree
- received love letters from Violetta ("Clay, I'm just scared to
- death of losing you"). He also continued to meet with Uncle
- Sasha, giving him information on Vienna embassy personnel and
- floor plans. But he was in an alcoholic fog much of the time.
- </p>
- <p> Confused and apprehensive, Lonetree approached the CIA
- station chief at an embassy Christmas party on Dec. 14, 1986.
- Edging the man toward a crackling fire, Lonetree said he had
- been seeing Soviet government officials in Vienna.
- </p>
- <p> For the next ten days the CIA debriefed Lonetree. Since the
- CIA is not a law-enforcement agency, it was not interested in
- preserving evidence or making sure he would talk in the future
- -- only in how much damage Lonetree had done and whether he
- might be used as a double agent. These deficiencies reveal a
- weakness in how the U.S. Government handles espionage by
- Americans overseas, a weakness that would haunt the CIA later.
- </p>
- <p> Thick-skulled to the end, Lonetree said he bore no ill will
- toward Violetta. He told a CIA officer, "If Sasha was really her
- uncle, then she was somewhat obligated to support him."
- </p>
- <p> A STRAIGHT-UP MARINE
- </p>
- <p> After Hartman in early 1986 decided to cut the size of the
- Soviet work force in hopes of minimizing complaints about the
- security dangers it posed, two Soviet cooks were dismissed. Nina
- Sheriakovo, the senior cook, was blond and busty and, at 40,
- wore low-cut dresses. But the Marines did not think she was
- particularly attractive, partly because she did not bathe often.
- </p>
- <p> Her assistant, Galina N. Golotina, had been with the embassy
- since January 1985. More petite than Nina, Galya was 28, weighed
- 115 lbs. and stood 5 ft. 3 in. tall. She had green eyes and
- brown hair. The Marines made fun of Nina, claiming she made a
- habit of offering to show them her breasts. But they liked
- Galya, a divorcee with an eight-year-old son.
- </p>
- <p> As the noncommissioned officer in charge of ordering food
- supplies, Corporal Arnold Bracy had the most contact with Galya.
- Several times a week, the 6-ft. 1-in. Marine consulted her to
- find out what food the cooks needed. Bracy was a straight-up
- Marine. The fact that he did not drink or carouse with girls
- made him an unlikely candidate for recruitment. But Bracy had
- one weak spot: he had obviously developed a fondness for Galya.
- </p>
- <p> Certainly there was nothing in Bracy's background that would
- lead one to suspect that he could be compromised. Born on Nov.
- 28, 1965, he grew up in a religious family in Queens. His
- father, Theodore R. Bracy, is a subway motorman and an
- evangelist deacon at Calvary Full Gospel Church in Woodside,
- N.Y. Both he and his wife Frieda have bachelor's degrees in
- theology.
- </p>
- <p> After high school, Bracy joined the Marines in June 1983. He
- later signed up for security-guard school and chose Moscow as
- his first post. There he at first retained his prim view of sex.
- While he had previously dated a few girls, he had remained a
- virgin because of his religious convictions. Before Marine
- parties, several women would change clothes in Bracy's room in
- front of him, hoping to attract his attention. He would walk
- out so he wouldn't see them naked.
- </p>
- <p> But Galya was different. She was not pushy and did not run
- around with other men. Bracy admired that. Her English was not
- good, and that made him feel protective toward her. In the
- months before Galya was fired, several of the Marines noticed
- that she and Bracy seemed to have become quite close. Sensing
- the same thing, Wingate warned Bracy about fraternizing. He
- appeared to see her less after that. But many of the Marines
- thought the relationship had not cooled.
- </p>
- <p> Frederick Mecke, who had succeeded Klingenmaier as regional
- security officer, was at the embassy on Sunday, June 29, 1986,
- when Bracy asked if he could talk with him. They went into the
- secure "bubble" on the ninth floor, and Bracy began unraveling a
- bizarre tale. He said he had run into Galya in a park near the
- Kosmos Hotel, and they began chatting. By then she was working
- as a nanny for the family of Philippe Duchateau, the embassy's
- deputy press secretary. After some pleasantries, she blurted
- out that someone, possibly from the KGB, had asked her to bring
- Bracy to a certain apartment. The idea was to entrap him
- sexually. If she did not cooperate, she told Bracy, UPDK would
- fire her. After ten minutes, Bracy went back to the embassy. Or
- so he told Mecke.
- </p>
- <p> Mecke reported the incident to State Department security. He
- decided Galya should not be fired as the Duchateaus' nanny;
- after all, she had reported the KGB attempt. But Mecke let
- Bracy know he should have nothing to do with her.
- </p>
- <p> Mecke was in his office on the afternoon of Aug. 20, 1986,
- when Duchateau came in with a strange tale. He and his wife had
- let Stephen Wright, an ABC-TV sound man, and his wife stay in
- their apartment while they were away on vacation. When the
- Duchateaus got back, Wright told them a black Marine and Galya
- were having sex in the bedroom as they arrived at the
- apartment. Flustered, the Marine told the Wrights he had been
- inspecting the place. He quickly left.
- </p>
- <p> Bracy's report of nearly two months earlier flashed through
- Mecke's mind. He checked the liberty log for the day when the
- Wrights arrived at the Duchateaus' apartment. Bracy was the only
- black Marine who had signed out.
- </p>
- <p> Mecke immediately called him in. Bracy seemed nervous. He
- said he had been in the apartment with Galya but denied having
- sex with her, claiming he went to the apartment because the
- former embassy cook was pressuring him to cooperate with the
- KGB. He wanted to tell her he would have no further contact
- with her. Mecke did not believe a word of it. Why would anyone
- visit someone to say he would not see her?
- </p>
- <p> The next day Mecke told Hartman about it, saying of Bracy:
- "He is very vulnerable. It's in our best interests to get him
- out of the country immediately." Hartman agreed. On orders from
- Mecke, Duchateau fired Galya.
- </p>
- <p> That night Corporal Robert J. Williams went to see Bracy in
- his room at the Marine House. Williams later informed the Naval
- Investigative Service that Bracy told him he had fallen in love
- with Galya and had given the Soviets classified documents in
- exchange for thousands of dollars. Williams subsequently
- recanted, saying the NIS coerced him. Bracy also denies making
- the comments.
- </p>
- <p> Yet others have said Williams told them essentially the same
- thing. His former girlfriend, Taina Laurivuori, a Finnish
- citizen who worked as a nanny to a U.S. embassy employee, said
- she accompanied Bracy and Williams to the airport four days
- after Duchateau reported the incident in his apartment.
- Laurivuori said Bracy looked sad, and she asked Williams what
- was wrong with him. Williams said a Soviet girl had set Bracy
- up.
- </p>
- <p> Later, after Bracy was arrested, Williams called Laurivuori
- from Vienna, where he was then based. Recalling the ride to the
- airport with Bracy, Williams said to her, "Don't tell anybody,
- but the day before we went to the airport, Arnold told me he
- was doing that spy stuff."
- </p>
- <p> Lance Corporal Philip J. Sink, a Marine security guard
- stationed in Vienna, also said Williams told him that Bracy had
- confessed to him. Sink quoted Williams as saying, "Bracy came to
- me one night and was crying and telling me he was in over his
- head. He had done things he shouldn't have done, and he didn't
- know what to do." Williams said something about a $1,000
- payment.
- </p>
- <p> Bracy was demoted to corporal and sent to the Air Ground
- Combat Center at Twentynine Palms, Calif.
- </p>
- <p> "WE'VE GOT ANOTHER SPY!"
- </p>
- <p> On Dec. 22, 1986, after Lonetree's confession in Vienna, the
- NIS began an investigation of security breaches at Moscow
- station. The NIS would interview 487 Marines and 1,285 other
- people and administer polygraph tests to 260 people.
- </p>
- <p> As espionage cases go, it should have been easy. Lonetree
- had already confessed to taking $3,500 from the Soviets in
- return for classified information. He was still talking. It
- remained for the NIS to warn Lonetree of his rights, take his
- confession and tie up a few loose ends.
- </p>
- <p> But the NIS proved to be as good at investigating espionage
- as the State Department was at protecting security. In
- fairness, the FBI normally handles espionage investigations.
- Only when the target of the investigation is a military man and
- no civilians are involved do the military services have
- exclusive jurisdiction.
- </p>
- <p> NIS agents took Lonetree to a suite in the Strudlhof hotel
- near the Vienna embassy. After waiving his right to a lawyer, he
- held forth about his escapades with Violetta and Sasha. He
- almost seemed to be enjoying the attention. At one point,
- Lonetree told the openmouthed agents that he knew Yefimov liked
- him because of the way he smiled at him.
- </p>
- <p> The next morning, the agents flew Lonetree to London, into
- the Holiday Inn near Heathrow airport. After 2 1/2 days of
- interviews, Thomas E. Brannon, an NIS polygraph agent, talked
- with Lonetree for six hours. The following day he began
- administering polygraph tests. After Lonetree signed a second
- statement based on what he told Brannon, he began registering
- deceptive responses on the machine. Brannon thought the Marine
- was holding something back.
- </p>
- <p> Brannon decided Lonetree must have taken documents from the
- embassy in Vienna and began pressing him. Lonetree continued to
- deny taking any documents. As Brannon increased the pressure,
- Lonetree finally said, "Do you want me to lie to you?" "Yes,"
- Brannon replied.
- </p>
- <p> Lonetree said he stole three top-secret documents from the
- embassy's fourth-floor CPU and 200 secret documents he was
- supposed to burn at the embassy. Then he began hyperventilating
- and went into the bathroom to splash cold water on his face.
- When he returned, he said he wanted a lawyer.
- </p>
- <p> Slow as he was, Lonetree saw no point in talking to someone
- who told him to lie. Within 48 hours the NIS established that he
- had in fact lied: the secret documents never existed, nor had he
- been on watch when he said he took them. But the damage had been
- done. By pressing Lonetree too hard and losing his confidence,
- the NIS had lost the cooperation that is so vital in an
- espionage case.
- </p>
- <p> By March 1987 the NIS had interviewed 200 Marines, CIA
- officers, diplomats and military attaches who might have known
- anything about Lonetree. Still the NIS had not interviewed
- Bracy. He was thought to be a 5.0 Marine -- the perfect
- performance score -- and was low on the interview list.
- </p>
- <p> That changed on March 16, 1987, when veteran NIS agent David
- Moyer was in Vienna to discuss Lonetree's case with the CIA
- station chief. Now Moyer learned something startling from the
- chief: Lonetree had mentioned that Bracy told him in Moscow he
- was secretly seeing the Soviet cook, Galya, and that she wanted
- to introduce him to her uncle. Recognizing that the KGB might
- have recruited yet another spy, Moyer cabled NIS headquarters
- and said Bracy should be interviewed immediately in California.
- </p>
- <p> The last thing to do at this point was to interview Bracy.
- In any investigation, all the facts must be assembled before the
- target is confronted. Had the NIS gone about its job properly,
- it would have done a thorough background investigation into
- Bracy's history and character. But NIS special agent R. Michael
- Embry in Twentynine Palms was ordered to interview Bracy
- immediately. He began doing so on March 18, 1987.
- </p>
- <p> Embry felt Bracy was lying when he said he had not had sex
- with Galya. But he did not think Bracy had committed espionage.
- The next day, two NIS polygraph agents took Bracy to a motel
- near Twentynine Palms for lie-detector tests. When the
- operators told him he was registering deceptive reactions, Bracy
- began changing his story about his meeting with Galya in the
- Duchateaus' apartment. In a statement he signed after the test,
- he said, "She moved closer to me and initiated the sexual
- contact, and we began making out. After a short time she
- suggested we go to the bedroom, where we had sex. After having
- sexual intercourse, she told me that they had been putting
- pressure on her family so she would arrange for me to meet
- `Uncle Sasha.' She implied that he really was not her uncle but
- that was what she was supposed to tell me." She said her uncle
- would be interested in learning "who was leaving the embassy and
- who was going to replace them, and the names of the people
- working for the CIA."
- </p>
- <p> The following day, Bracy signed another statement, one that
- would rock the intelligence community. According to that
- statement, Bracy ran into Lonetree one night in the kitchen of
- the Marine House in January 1986. Lonetree "was very drunk,"
- Bracy said. "He was obviously pretty worked up and mad at the
- system and how the Marine detachment was run. He remarked that
- he was paying them back in his own way. I asked him what he
- meant, and he said, `I've been letting people in the embassy.' I
- knew he was talking about Russians. He said he had done it many
- times."
- </p>
- <p> About two weeks later, Bracy said, he saw Lonetree escorting
- a Soviet man into the courtyard one night and on another night
- saw him escorting someone through the embassy itself. "I felt
- sort of sorry for him, so I decided not to report what he had
- told me," Bracy said. "He told me at that time that this had
- been going on all the time. I had been standing duty with him,
- and if I did not cooperate, I would be just as guilty as he
- was."
- </p>
- <p> Beginning in February, Bracy said, he agreed to turn off the
- alarms while Lonetree brought Soviets into secure areas. He also
- warned him if the sergeant-of-the-guard was coming. He said he
- helped let Soviets into the CPU three times for an hour each
- time. Bracy said Lonetree gave him $1,000 for helping him.
- </p>
- <p> Bracy signed this final incriminating statement on Friday,
- March 20, 1987. At that point, he overheard the agents talking
- outside the room. One of them said, "We've got ourselves another
- spy!"
- </p>
- <p> As soon as he heard the comment, Bracy told the agents he
- wanted to retract his statement. They told him he could be
- charged with perjury for swearing falsely under oath. He said he
- would rather go to jail for perjury than espionage. The next
- day, Bracy said he wanted a lawyer. He never talked to the NIS
- again. The NIS then compounded its blunders by arresting Bracy
- on the spot. After he retracted his statement, the NIS had no
- evidence to hold him on.
- </p>
- <p> IGNITING A FIRE STORM
- </p>
- <p> When I interviewed Bracy at the coffee shop outside the
- Quantico Marine base, he said that the NIS agents got him to
- implicate himself by telling him that the statements would only
- help in their investigation of Lonetree. According to Bracy, the
- agents came up with the scenario that Lonetree and Bracy let the
- Soviets into the embassy. He said they asked him hypothetical
- questions, then wrote the answers as fact.
- </p>
- <p> But it was one thing to implicate others in crime and
- another to confess to espionage himself. Unless he had been
- tortured, it was difficult to see why Bracy would confess --
- unless he was in fact guilty. What made me decide he was
- telling the truth when he confessed to letting the KGB into the
- embassy was the fact that his subsequent accounts clashed
- repeatedly with the accounts of other witnesses I interviewed.
- Indeed they even clashed with Bracy's own version of the events.
- I was to find that every time he opened his mouth, Bracy told
- a different version of what took place between him and Galya.
- </p>
- <p> Also persuasive was Bracy's detailed knowledge of how easily
- the guard at Post 3 could let the KGB into the CPU at night. As
- Bracy told me, the Marine at Post 1 guarding the main entrance
- left at 11:30 p.m. At that point, the Marine at Post 3 on the
- ninth floor controlled access to the entire embassy through
- video cameras and intercoms. That Marine could not only let the
- KGB through the front door; he could also let the KGB into the
- secure areas and provide combinations to the CPU vault.
- </p>
- <p> To be sure, the combinations were encased in plastic
- pouches. After sealing them, a CPU communicator wrapped them in
- tape that he signed. If a pouch were opened, it could not be
- resealed. The next morning, a communicator checked to make sure
- it was intact. But it would have been relatively easy for the
- KGB to substitute a pouch complete with tape and forged
- signatures.
- </p>
- <p> The one defense against a surreptitious entry -- the CPU
- alarm system -- was useless. When the CPU alarms were
- triggered, a buzzer sounded, and a red light went on at Post 3.
- By flipping a switch, the Marine could silence the buzzer and
- turn off the red light. A yellow light then went on to show that
- the alarm had gone off. Only a communicator from the CPU could
- turn off the yellow light by resetting the alarms. But the
- system did not show when the alarms had been triggered. The
- Marine on Post 3 could easily let the KGB into the CPU at 2 a.m.
- Then at 6 a.m. he could tell the CPU communicators the alarms
- had just gone off.
- </p>
- <p> In the end, the answer to the puzzle lay in Bracy's six-page
- confession. Most Marines did not realize, as Bracy did, that
- they could silence the alarms in the CPU and lie about when the
- alarms had gone off. When CIA officers read his statement, they
- felt it was authentic.
- </p>
- <p> On the other hand, there was an air of unreality to Bracy's
- description of Lonetree's involvement. The two were not close.
- It was unlikely the reclusive Lonetree, even if drunk, would
- tell Bracy he was letting the Soviets into the embassy.
- </p>
- <p> Ultimately, it became clear even to the NIS that Bracy had
- made up the story that Lonetree let the KGB into the embassy.
- Bracy had claimed he helped Lonetree let the Soviets into the
- CPU in February 1986. But the two stood posts together at night
- only twice -- in October 1985 and in November 1985. Lonetree
- passed lie-detector tests on his statement that he had not
- conspired with Bracy.
- </p>
- <p> Bracy's confession was like a picture of a human face drawn
- by a schizophrenic. One side was real, the other -- relating to
- Lonetree's actions -- was not. But what if Lonetree were taken
- out of the picture? What if Bracy let the Soviets in by
- himself? Then the face became whole.
- </p>
- <p> According to this version, Bracy first began having sex with
- Galya in January 1986, as he confessed. Galya then introduced
- him to her "uncle." Afraid that he would be found out, Bracy
- began letting the Soviets into the CPU in February. The report
- of seeing Galya in the park in June 1986 was a ruse to throw off
- suspicion.
- </p>
- <p> When the NIS confronted him, Bracy realized that the agents
- were after Lonetree, not him. To clear himself, he made up the
- story of Lonetree's involvement, thinking he would shift the
- blame. He may not have realized that a co-conspirator is just as
- culpable under the law as the perpetrator.
- </p>
- <p> Most compelling is that this version of events conforms with
- Yefimov's demands of Lonetree. The KGB officer asked Lonetree
- to place bugs in the offices of the CIA station chief, the
- ambassador and the regional security officer. He did not ask him
- to place bugs in the CPU, which should have been the KGB's first
- target -- unless the KGB had already penetrated it.
- </p>
- <p> By this scenario, the KGB was not trying to recruit Bracy to
- replace Lonetree. It was the other way around. By the time
- Yefimov began meeting with Lonetree in early February 1986, the
- KGB had already recruited Bracy, according to Bracy's statement.
- </p>
- <p> The NIS, wedded to the idea that two or even three Marine
- guards were needed to let the KGB into the embassy, never came
- to this conclusion. Recognizing that Lonetree had not conspired
- with Bracy, the NIS spent countless hours trying to fit other
- Marine suspects into the conspiracy.
- </p>
- <p> Unlike the NIS, the FBI concluded that only the guard
- standing Post 3 was needed to let the KGB into the CPU. In
- fact, the FBI decided that security was so lax that the KGB
- could have got into the CPU by simply distracting the Marine at
- Post 3, possibly with a girl.
- </p>
- <p> Ultimately, this was the most scandalous fact of all: that
- the security of Moscow station and the protection of many of
- America's most important global secrets depended on the
- integrity of a single young Marine stationed on the KGB's home
- turf.
- </p>
- <p> "I didn't let anybody in the building," Bracy told me. "If I
- did anything, I'd be in the brig like Lonetree. I'm out of the
- brig, so it didn't happen."
- </p>
- <p> Bracy's confession ignited a fire storm in Washington. Now
- it seemed there was no question that the KGB had got into the
- jewels at Moscow station. There was only one problem: Bracy had
- recanted. Nor was there any corroboration for his story.
- </p>
- <p> The Marines announced Bracy's arrest on March 24, 1987,
- saying he was suspected of espionage. Two days later, the
- Marines announced that additional charges had been filed
- against Lonetree. According to the new charges, Lonetree let the
- Soviets into the CPU and other sensitive areas of the embassy
- while Bracy acted as lookout. The new charges were based solely
- on Bracy's confession. Suddenly the Marine security-guard
- scandal was front-page news.
- </p>
- <p> Unfortunately, interrogations that brought out allegations
- of espionage tended to collapse as soon as the Marines left the
- interrogation rooms. On April 19, 1987, Williams retracted his
- statements against Bracy. The Marine Corps charged Williams with
- making false statements. On May 10, 1987, Bracy formally
- retracted his statements, saying they were coerced by the NIS.
- Five days later, the Marine Corps dropped the charges against
- Lonetree that had been based on Bracy's confession. Finally, on
- June 12, the Marine Corps dropped espionage charges against
- Bracy.
- </p>
- <p> In recommending dismissal of the charges, Bracy's
- prosecutor, Major Charles A. Ryan, admitted there was no
- corroboration for his confession but said he still believed
- Bracy was guilty. Unless there was "significant coercion," he
- wrote in a memo, "there is no conceivable reason why any Marine
- would ever confess to a crime such as espionage unless he had
- actually engaged in this conduct against his country. The
- inescapable conclusion I am forced to draw is that Corporal
- Bracy was involved in espionage." (Bracy, no longer a Marine,
- nonetheless still lives on the Marine base at Quantico, Va.; he
- married a woman in the service.)
- </p>
- <p> As for Lonetree, he was convicted by a military jury of 13
- counts of espionage and sentenced to 30 years in prison. This
- was later reduced to 25 years. He will be eligible for parole
- after serving a third of his sentence. Even as he sat in the
- brig at Quantico because of the trap Violetta Seina had laid
- for him, Lonetree pined away for her. He asked his father to
- find her and tell her he was O.K. Insisted Lonetree: "I believe
- she loves me."
- </p>
- <p> A CHILLING DISCOVERY
- </p>
- <p> By the end of 1987, the State Department had begun leaking
- stories that no evidence of a penetration of the embassy in
- Moscow had been found. The stories overlooked the fact that the
- KGB had penetrated the embassy by introducing bugged
- typewriters into secure areas and obtaining secret information
- about the embassy and its employees from Lonetree.
- </p>
- <p> What the State Department and the press did not know is that
- evidence of a penetration had been found -- but the CIA and the
- NSA covered it up. In the summer of 1987, the State Department
- shipped the entire CPU and all the communications equipment from
- both the Moscow and Leningrad missions -- 120 crates from Moscow
- alone -- to Virginia. After the FBI took custody of the
- material, some 20 NSA technicians began examining each part,
- using X-ray, spectroscopic and infrared analysis.
- </p>
- <p> In August 1987 the NSA made a chilling discovery. The power
- line to the CPU in Moscow had been replaced. That meant the KGB
- could have diverted signals from cipher machines within the CPU
- to the outside. Next the NSA found that 8-in. by 14-in. circuit
- boards, along with chips the size of quarters, had been replaced
- in the printers. The new components appeared to be diverting
- uncoded signals from the "red side" of the communications
- circuits to the power line. The NSA later found similarly
- sinister devices in the CPU from Leningrad.
- </p>
- <p> The KGB had turned the CPU into a gigantic listening device.
- Because the Soviets could compare the uncoded "red side" signals
- with the encoded "black side," they most likely could replicate
- the cipher keys -- the unique data that was needed to decipher
- the messages -- used by other American embassies throughout the
- world. That raised the possibility that the KGB had been
- listening in on communications not only from Moscow and
- Leningrad but also from Vienna, Helsinki and London. Since
- equipment in the CPU had been replaced in 1984, the penetration
- of the jewels to Moscow station could have gone back that far.
- </p>
- <p> Only a dozen people, including President Reagan, were told
- of the findings. In deciding to keep the findings secret, the
- CIA and the NSA could always claim that there were legitimate
- national security reasons for doing so. But there was another
- reason for the secrecy. "There's a cover-up to hide
- embarrassment, to cover ass," said one intelligence official.
- </p>
- <p> According to these sources, the result of the communications
- penetration was the decapitation of the CIA's operations in the
- Soviet Union. Nearly a dozen CIA officers have been expelled,
- and at least 25 Soviets have been executed in the Soviet Union
- since 1983 on suspicion of collaborating with the CIA. At least
- two of those executed were, in fact, Soviets working for the
- CIA. The rest were innocent.
- </p>
- <p> While Edward Lee Howard, the former CIA officer who defected
- to the Soviets, was responsible for several of the executions,
- he knew CIA agents only by their code names. Intelligence
- sources believe the majority of the damage to CIA operations was
- caused by a penetration of Moscow station communications.
- </p>
- <p> The same ineptitude that led to the security breaches in the
- first place now conspired to protect the perpetrators. Bracy,
- who probably would not have been the first Marine to let the KGB
- into the embassy, got off scot-free. As the scandal faded from
- the newspapers, the cover-up became complete.
- </p>
- <p> It was the ultimate irony that Ronald Reagan, who came to
- office with a mandate to strengthen the nation's defenses, wound
- up presiding over the worst intelligence debacle since the CIA's
- abortive 1961 invasion of Cuba at the Bay of Pigs.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-